Impression Combined impression with PET CT: 1. Overall similar distrubution of numerous foci of markedly...

Neuroendocrine Tumor (NET)June 18, 2026Navis AI

Ask Navis about your situation

This answer is general. Get one about your specific case — no signup, answered right here.

For informational purposes only

This answer was generated by AI grounded in NCCN guidelines and published medical literature. It is not medical advice. Always consult your oncologist or care team before making treatment decisions.

Question asked:

Impression Combined impression with PET CT: 1. Overall similar distrubution of numerous foci of markedly somatostatin receptor expressing liver metastases, with decreased uptake and size compared to [date removed] and sequentially decreasing in size, metabolic activity and extent from [date removed], suggesting ongoing response to treatment. Decrease in uptake of the single osseous metastasis in the right femur. 2. Overall similar mild uptake in non-enlarged neck and chest nodes. 3. No new disease. 4. Distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy without corresponding abnormal residual enhancement or tracer avidity to suggest local recurrence. Narrative EXAMINATION: CT CHEST W CONTRAST, CT ABDOMEN AND PELVIS W CONTRAST CLINICAL INDICATION: RG1125002 VMT study TECHNIQUE: CTB C1 CT Chest with intravenous contrast. Computed tomography was obtained through the chest with intravenous contrast. (accession 57527034), CTB A2 CT Abdomen pelvis with oral and intravenous contrast. Computed tomography was obtained through the abdomen and pelvis with intravenous and oral contrast. (accession 57527035) CTB A5B Abdomen Liver Two Phase Computed tomography was obtained through the abdomen with intravenous contrast in two phases - arterial and venous phase. CONTRAST: IOHEXOL 350 MG/ML IV SOLN,100 mL Intravenous,[date removed] 1306 COMPARISON: PET CT done the same day, CT chest abdomen pelvis of [date removed] and PET/CT of [date removed]. PET/CT of [date removed], CT chest abdomen pelvis of [date removed] FINDINGS: Supraclavicular region: Few similar nonenlarged prominent supraclavicular nodes, for example 0.5 cm left supraclavicular node. Mediastinum: Stable few prominent mediastinal lymph nodes, though no abnormally enlarged lymph nodes by the size criteria. For example, 4 mm right lower paratracheal lymph node on image 9/46 and previously 0.5 cm right lower paratracheal node (9/53) and 1.1 x 0.6 cm right cardiophrenic lymph node on image 9/99 and previously 1.4 x 0.6 cm right cardiophrenic node (9/107). Heart and great vessels: Mild atherosclerotic calcification of the coronary arteries. Similar small pericardial effusion. Lungs: Unchanged 3 mm left lower lobe nodules (7/60 and 94). A tiny 2 mm left upper lobe nodule is also unchanged (7/44). No new or enlarging pulmonary nodules. Bibasilar atelectasis. Pleura: Unremarkable. Chest wall: Bilateral mastectomies, with implants in place. Bilateral axillary nodal dissections with surgical clips. Liver: Multiple cystic lesions as before without corresponding tracer uptake. The largest cystic lesion in the right hepatic lobe measuring 10.6 cm, previously 11 cm, current image 15/29. Overall similar distrubution of numerous foci of moderate to marked uptake in both lobes of the liver, the majority of which have slightly decreased in uptake intensity and metabolic extent. For example: * Segment 7 lesion, now measures 0.6 x 0.8 cm on image 6/30 and previously 1.1 x 1.4 cm (12/237, 3/196, 6/20 on diagnostic CT), previously 2.0 x 2.1 cm. Current maximum SUV of 26 and previously 32 * Segment 4 lesion, now measures 1.2 x 0.9 cm on image 6/47 and previously 1.7 x 1.9 cm (12/277, 3/229, 6/53 on diagnostic CT), previously 1.9 x 2.8 cm. Current maximum SUV is 30, previously 41. * Segment 2 lesion, now not well-seen and could be related to contrast bolus timing, previously 0.6 x 0.7 cm (12/264, 3/218, 6/42 on diagnostic CT). Current maximum SUV of 18, previously 24 * Hepatic dome liver lesion measures 1.1 cm and previously 1.6 x 1.4 cm, current image 15/22 and previously 6/20. Current maximum SUV of 14.4 and previously 39 Gallbladder: Absent Bile ducts: CBD measures up to 5.3 mm, likely related to reservoir effect. No obstructing mass or calculus. Spleen: Status post splenectomy. Pancreas: Distal pancreatectomy. No new or residual enhancement at the resection bed to suggest local recurrence. No dilation of the remainder of the main pancreatic duct. Adrenal glands: Unremarkable. Kidneys and Ureters: Unremarkable. Lymph Nodes: No retroperitoneal or abdominal mesenteric or pelvic lymphadenopathy Vasculature: Atherosclerotic calcification of aorta and its branches without evidence of aneurysms. Bowel: Colonic diverticulosis without evidence of acute diverticulitis. Moderate stool. The stomach appears underdistended. Visualized small bowel loops appear within normal limits. Reproductive organs: Hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Calcified pelvic phleboliths. Bladder: Unremarkable. Peritoneum: Unremarkable. Abdominal wall: Bilateral gluteal injection soft tissue granulomas, as before. Bones: Degenerative changes of the lumbar spine. Similar subtle sclerosis at the site of intensely avid focal uptake on same day PET/CT within right anterior femoral head (15/159). Diffuse demineralization

TL;DR: Your scans show your neuroendocrine tumor is responding well to treatment — the cancer spots in your liver are getting smaller and less active, and there's no new disease.


KEY POINTS:

  • Liver metastases are shrinking — Multiple tumor spots have decreased in size and metabolic activity (how "active" they appear on the PET scan) compared to your April scan, and even more improvement since February
  • PET/CT shows decreased tracer uptake — The somatostatin receptor tracer (the radioactive marker used to find neuroendocrine tumors) is showing less intense uptake in your liver lesions, which indicates reduced tumor activity
  • Bone metastasis improving — Your right femur (thighbone) lesion also shows decreased uptake, suggesting that spot is responding too
  • No new disease detected — Importantly, no new tumors have appeared in your chest, abdomen, pelvis, or elsewhere
  • Surgical sites look clean — Your distal pancreatectomy (partial pancreas removal) and splenectomy (spleen removal) sites show no signs of recurrence

NEXT STEP:

Schedule a follow-up appointment with your oncologist to discuss these results, confirm your current treatment is working, and determine if any adjustments or next imaging timepoints are needed.


FULL ANSWER

Understanding Your Scan Results

You've had a combined CT and PET/CT scan performed on [date removed]. This is an excellent imaging combination for monitoring neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), because:

  • CT (Computed Tomography) shows the physical size and location of tumors
  • PET/CT (Positron Emission Tomography) uses a radioactive tracer that binds to somatostatin receptors — proteins that neuroendocrine tumor cells express. This shows how metabolically active (how "alive" and growing) the tumors are.

According to NCCN Guidelines for Neuroendocrine Tumors, SSTR-PET/CT (somatostatin receptor PET imaging) is the preferred imaging modality for staging and monitoring NETs, which is exactly what you received.


What Your Results Show: The Good News

1. Your Liver Metastases Are Responding to Treatment

Your report shows "numerous foci of markedly somatostatin receptor expressing liver metastases" — meaning you have multiple tumor spots in your liver that light up on the PET scan because they express somatostatin receptors (a hallmark of neuroendocrine tumors).

The critical finding: These lesions show "decreased uptake and size compared to [date removed] and sequentially decreasing in size, metabolic activity and extent from [date removed]."

In plain language: Your liver tumors are getting smaller and less active over time. Let me show you specific examples:

  • Segment 7 lesion: Shrank from 2.0 × 2.1 cm (February) → 1.1 × 1.4 cm (April) → 0.6 × 0.8 cm (now)

    • SUV (a measure of metabolic activity) dropped from 32 → 26 (lower is better — less active)
  • Segment 4 lesion: Decreased from 1.9 × 2.8 cm (February) → 1.7 × 1.9 cm (April) → 1.2 × 0.9 cm (now)

    • SUV dropped from 41 → 30 (significant decrease in activity)
  • Hepatic dome lesion: Shrank from 1.6 × 1.4 cm (April) → 1.1 cm (now)

    • SUV dropped dramatically from 39 → 14.4 (this is a major improvement)

What this means: Your current treatment is working. The tumors are not only shrinking in size, but they're also becoming less metabolically active — meaning the cancer cells are less "hungry" and less aggressive.


2. Your Bone Metastasis Is Also Improving

You have a single osseous (bone) metastasis in your right femur (thighbone). The report notes "Decrease in uptake of the single osseous metastasis in the right femur."

This means the tracer uptake in that bone lesion has decreased, indicating that spot is also responding to your treatment.


3. No New Disease

The report explicitly states: "No new disease."

This is critical. It means:

  • No new tumors have appeared in your chest
  • No new tumors in your abdomen or pelvis
  • No new lymph node involvement
  • No unexpected spread

4. Lymph Nodes Are Stable and Non-Enlarged

Your report notes:

  • "Overall similar mild uptake in non-enlarged neck and chest nodes"
  • "No retroperitoneal or abdominal mesenteric or pelvic lymphadenopathy" (no enlarged lymph nodes in your abdomen/pelvis)

This means your lymph nodes are not involved with cancer or are minimally involved and stable.


5. Your Surgical Sites Look Clean

You've had:

  • Distal pancreatectomy (removal of the tail of your pancreas)
  • Splenectomy (removal of your spleen)

The report states: "Distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy without corresponding abnormal residual enhancement or tracer avidity to suggest local recurrence."

Translation: There's no evidence of cancer coming back at either surgical site. The surgery appears to have been successful in removing the primary tumor.


What About the Other Findings?

Your report also mentions several other findings that are not related to your neuroendocrine tumor:

  • Cystic lesions in the liver: These are benign (non-cancerous) fluid-filled cysts. The largest one measures 10.6 cm, which is slightly smaller than before (was 11 cm). These don't light up on the PET scan, confirming they're not cancer.

  • Small lung nodules: You have tiny nodules (2-3 mm) in your lungs that are unchanged from previous scans. These are likely benign and not related to your NET.

  • Lymph nodes in chest: A few small lymph nodes in your mediastinum (central chest) and supraclavicular region (base of neck) are present but non-enlarged and stable. These show only mild tracer uptake, which is not concerning.

  • Atherosclerotic changes: Your report mentions some calcification in your coronary arteries and aorta — this is age-related wear and tear, not related to your cancer.

  • Surgical history: Your report notes you've had bilateral mastectomies (breast removal), hysterectomy, and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (removal of ovaries and fallopian tubes). These are documented for completeness but don't affect your current NET treatment.


How This Compares to Your Previous Scans

Your radiologist compared this scan to:

  • [date removed] (3 months ago)
  • [date removed] (4 months before that)

The pattern is clear: consistent improvement over time. Your tumors are not just stable — they're actively shrinking and becoming less metabolically active with each scan. This is the best possible response pattern.


Clinical Context: Why This Matters for NETs

According to NCCN Guidelines for Neuroendocrine Tumors, imaging response assessment is critical for:

  1. Confirming treatment efficacy — Your scans prove your current therapy is working
  2. Guiding treatment decisions — This response may support continuing your current treatment or potentially escalating to more aggressive therapy if appropriate
  3. Monitoring for progression — The absence of new disease is reassuring

The fact that you're showing metabolic response (decreased SUV values) in addition to anatomic response (smaller lesion sizes) is particularly encouraging. This dual response suggests your treatment is effectively targeting the tumor cells.


Questions to Ask Your Oncologist

Based on these excellent results, here are specific questions to discuss:

  1. "Based on this response, should I continue my current treatment, or do we need to adjust anything?"

  2. "What's the plan for monitoring going forward — how often should I have repeat imaging?" (NCCN Guidelines typically recommend imaging every 3-6 months for metastatic NETs, but your doctor may adjust based on your response)

  3. "Are there any clinical trials I should consider now that I'm showing good response?"

  4. "What would we consider 'complete response' for my disease, and how close are we to that goal?"

  5. "Should we discuss any additional therapies (like somatostatin analogs, targeted therapy, or immunotherapy) to consolidate this response?"

  6. "What imaging findings would prompt us to change treatment strategy?"


Key Takeaway

Your scans demonstrate that your neuroendocrine tumor is responding well to your current treatment. Your liver metastases are shrinking and becoming less active, your bone metastasis is improving, and there's no evidence of new disease. This is an excellent result and suggests your treatment plan is working effectively.

This information is for educational purposes only. Always consult your healthcare team for personalized medical advice and decisions.

Ask Navis about your case

That answer is general. Ask about your specific situation — no signup, answered right here.

Facing this with someone you love?

Keep the whole picture in one private place: records, a plain-language summary of where things stand, questions, and the people helping. Navis keeps it up to date so no one has to re-explain the story. Free, and only the people you invite can ever see it.

Start a care circle →