Yes he had oxaliplatin in Capox so he has had that twice with no results
Ask Navis about your situation
This answer is general. Get one about your specific case — no signup, answered right here.
For informational purposes only
This answer was generated by AI grounded in NCCN guidelines and published medical literature. It is not medical advice. Always consult your oncologist or care team before making treatment decisions.
I want to acknowledge what you're sharing - your husband has metastatic duodenal cancer with significant progression despite two rounds of CAPOX (oxaliplatin + capecitabine), and his genomic testing has revealed some important findings. This is a challenging situation, and I'm glad you're actively seeking information about next steps.
Understanding His Current Situation
What the imaging shows: His PET scan demonstrates widespread FDG-avid (metabolically active) lesions with progression - meaning the cancer is growing and spreading despite the chemotherapy he's already received. This tells his oncology team that the current approach isn't working and a treatment change is needed.
What his genomic test reveals - This is important:
His tumor has several significant findings:
-
HRD signature positive - This is potentially meaningful. HRD (Homologous Recombination Deficiency) suggests the cancer cells have difficulty repairing DNA damage. This finding, combined with his BRCA1 mutation (Q1756fs*74), opens specific treatment pathways.
-
Microsatellite stable (MSS) - This means immunotherapy alone (like checkpoint inhibitors) is less likely to be effective, which is important context.
-
MTAP loss - This is an emerging biomarker that some newer therapies target.
-
Other mutations (CDKN2A/2B loss, NF1, SMARCA4, CREBBP) - These provide additional information about the tumor's biology.
Clinical Reasoning for His Case
For metastatic duodenal adenocarcinoma that has progressed on standard chemotherapy, oncologists typically consider:
-
PARP inhibitors - Given his HRD signature and BRCA1 mutation, PARP inhibitors (like olaparib or rucaparib) are specifically designed to exploit this vulnerability. According to NCCN Guidelines for gastric cancer (duodenal cancer follows similar principles), PARP inhibitors are increasingly considered for HRD-positive tumors.
-
Targeted therapies - Depending on other factors, targeted approaches may be considered.
-
Clinical trials - Given his specific mutation profile, he may be eligible for trials targeting MTAP loss or other pathways.
-
Combination approaches - Sometimes PARP inhibitors are combined with other agents.
Critical Questions for His Oncology Team
Given his genomic results and progression on CAPOX, I'd strongly recommend asking:
-
"Given my HRD signature and BRCA1 mutation, have you considered PARP inhibitor therapy? If not, why not?" - This is a specific, evidence-based question based on his biomarkers.
-
"What clinical trials might I be eligible for given my specific mutation profile (MTAP loss, BRCA1 mutation, HRD signature)?" - Clinical trials may offer access to newer combinations.
-
"What is your recommended next treatment, and what is the rationale based on my genomic results?" - This ensures his doctor is using the genomic data to guide decisions.
-
"Are there any other genomic findings that should influence treatment selection?" - Make sure all findings are being considered.
-
"If this next treatment doesn't work, what would be the plan after that?" - Understanding the treatment sequence helps with planning.
Regarding Your Second Opinion Question
For BC Canada specifically:
- BC Cancer (provincial cancer agency) can facilitate second opinions through their tumor boards
- You can request a referral through his primary oncologist
- Many academic centers (like BC Cancer's Vancouver center) have expertise in rare cancers like duodenal adenocarcinoma
- His genomic report is portable - any oncologist can review it
The genomic data he has (FoundationOne CDx) is comprehensive and will be valuable for any second opinion consultation.
Important Context
The fact that his tumor is microsatellite stable (not MSI-high) and MMR intact (as you mentioned in your earlier question) means certain immunotherapy approaches are less likely to work as monotherapy, which is why the HRD signature and BRCA1 mutation become even more important - they point toward PARP inhibitor strategies.
This information is for educational purposes only. Always consult your healthcare team for personalized medical advice and decisions. Your husband's oncologist will determine the most appropriate next treatment based on his complete clinical picture, performance status, and other factors.
I'm here to help you understand his reports and formulate questions. Do you want me to explain any of the other genetic findings in more detail?
Ask Navis about your case
That answer is general. Ask about your specific situation — no signup, answered right here.
Facing this with someone you love?
Keep the whole picture in one private place: records, a plain-language summary of where things stand, questions, and the people helping. Navis keeps it up to date so no one has to re-explain the story. Free, and only the people you invite can ever see it.
Start a care circle →Have your records handy? Upload them for a deeper, personalized analysis →
Related Questions
Just finished the perspective therapeutics VMT-a-NET phase 1b dosing trial These are the results of my latest PET...
TL;DR: Your latest PET scan shows your cancer is stable—the tumors in your liver are about the same size as before, no new tumors appeared, and the tr
Return ONLY valid JSON. No markdown. Based on 2 medical records: DOCUMENT: IMG_2090.png (Imaging Report) Date:...
```json { "bottomLine": "Your Ga-68 Dotatate PET scans from June and August 2026 show stable metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor NET with liv
Return ONLY valid JSON. No markdown. Based on 2 medical records: DOCUMENT: IMG_2090.png (Imaging Report) Date:...
```json { "bottomLine": "Your Ga-68 Dotatate PET scans from June and August 2026 show stable metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor NET with liv
Return ONLY valid JSON. No markdown. Based on 2 medical records: DOCUMENT: IMG_2090.png (Imaging Report) Date:...
```json { "bottomLine": "Your Ga-68 Dotatate PET scans from June and August 2026 show stable metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor NET with liv
Return ONLY valid JSON. No markdown. Based on 2 medical records: DOCUMENT: IMG_2090.png (Imaging Report) Date:...
```json { "bottomLine": "Your Ga-68 Dotatate PET scans from June and August 2026 show stable metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor NET with liv
Return ONLY valid JSON. No markdown. Based on 2 medical records: DOCUMENT: IMG_2090.png (Imaging Report) Date:...
```json { "bottomLine": "Your Ga-68 Dotatate PET scans from June and August 2026 show stable metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor NET with liv
We are in the UK royal marsden. It is kind of hopeless or how to say? Is there any immunetherapy worth to pursue or...
TL;DR: Diffuse midline gliomas DMGs with H3K27M are very challenging, but immunotherapy and targeted approaches are actively being researched—the Roya
It is my daughter she completed 6 weeks of radio and tmz now she is on 3rd cycle of tmz 200mg. We are doing low meth...
TL;DR: Your daughter's treatment plan radiation + TMZ chemotherapy is standard for diffuse midline glioma, and her biomarkers MGMT methylated, EGFR A2